Animal issues debated, tabled in Amherst

A provision against maliciously and willfully killing an animal does not apply to a resident who sees a dog threatening a child.

“I don’t want anyone to be prevented from defending themselves, their family or their property from an animal that is posing a threat,” Pecora said. “If I’m on my own property and there is a dog threatening my child, I don’t care whose feelings it hurts, I’m going to kill the dog. Self-defense is self-defense, right?”

Councilwoman Jennifer Wasilk agreed, saying not too many years ago a vicious dog on Cleveland Avenue attacked people and other animals.

“People were afraid they were going to be killed by this dog,” Wasilk said. “I don’t want to discourage people from protecting themselves.”

She asked for clarification of vague words such as “sanitary” rather than relying on personal interpretation.

via Animal issues debated, tabled in Amherst.


This site posts News hits about Dangerous Dogs and Dog Laws. WE do not write these stories. WE do not comment on these stories. WE do not add to these stories. We have offered to change information (and we have done this on several occasions) if the reporting news outlet updates or changes their story. Please don't write us nasty, rude or foul mouthed messages about, pit bulls, statistics or fact checking. If you have an issue with the way a story is reported please contact the news outlet that is linked at the bottom of the post. Knowing this, if you still wish to comment, please do so.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s